SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses following BNT162b2 vaccination in individuals with multiple sclerosis receiving different disease-modifying treatments.

Introduction: The study aims to evaluate the concentration of IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike1 protein (S1RBD) in BNT162b2- vaccinated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) individuals receiving disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). Methods: Serum from 126 RRMS volunteers was collected 3 months after the administration of the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine. Additional samples were analyzed after the administration of the booster dose in fingolimod- treated MS. Anti-S1RBD IgG antibody concentrations were quantified using the ABBOTT SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay. Results: Anti-S1RBD IgG antibody concentrations in RRMS individuals receiving natalizumab, interferons, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate showed no significant difference to those in healthy controls. However, fingolimod-treated MS individuals showed a marked inability to produce SARS-CoV-2- specific antibodies (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a booster dose was not able to elicit the production of IgG antibodies in a large portion of matched individuals. Discussion: A possible explanation for the altered immune response in fingolimod- treated MS individuals could be due to the medication inhibiting the circulation of lymphocytes, and possibly in turn inhibiting antibody production. Overall, patients on DMTs are generally of no disadvantage toward mounting an immune response against the vaccine. Nevertheless, further studies require evaluating non-humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination, as well as the suitability of such vaccinations on patients treated with fingolimod.

Safety and Monitoring of the treatment with Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are widely used given their proven efficacy in the relapsing form of the disease, while recently Siponimod and Ocrelizumab have been approved for the progressive forms of the disease. Currently, 22 Disease-modifying drugs are approved by the FDA, while in 2012, only nine were in the market. From March 2019 until August 2020, six new drugs were approved. This rapid development of new DMTs highlights the need to update our knowledge about their short and long-term safety. OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the available safety data for all the Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis and presents the monitoring plan before and during the treatment. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PUBMED and COCHRANE databases. Also, we manually searched key journals and abstracts from major annual meetings of Neurology, references of relevant reviews, and relative articles. We prioritized systematic reviews, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, and other observational studies. Special attention was paid to guidelines and papers focusing on the safety and monitoring of DMTs. Data for oral (Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, Fumarates, Teriflunomide, Cladribine), injectables (Interferons, Glatiramer acetate, Ofatumumab), and infusion therapies (Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, Alemtuzumab) are presented.

COVID-19 severity among patients with multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus 19 pandemic has raised new relevant questions regarding the management of patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) treated with different immunosuppressive and immunomodulant drugs. In most COVID-19 outcomes analyses, due to the small available sample size, patients treated with cladribine were grouped with patients treated with other treatments. METHODS: Three major databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and the most recent MS congress libraries were searched for extracting original articles on COVID-19 and multiple sclerosis. The key inclusion criteria were the presence of data on pwMS treated with cladribine and with documented positivity for COVID-19. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Dutch Cochrane center critical review checklist proposed by MOOSE. A common-effect meta-analysis was used for estimating the pooled proportion of patients with severe events (hospitalizations, pneumonia, ICU admissions and deaths) and heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: 13 articles were included in the analysis and the median quality of the articles reached a level of 4. The selected studies included 5138 patients with COVID-19, of whom 107 (2.1%) were treated with cladribine. Pooled estimates of hospitalization and death were 9.36% and 0% for patients treated with cladribine, 14.98% and 2.66% for pwMS under other treatments. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that pwMS treated with cladribine are not at a greater risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022329464).

Quantitative and qualitative features of acute phase-adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a large sample of people with multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Few data are available on adverse events (AE) associated to vaccines in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). AIMS: to study the incidence of acute phase AE (AP-AE) related to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in pwMS compared to a control group, and to analyze the association between AP-AE and disease modifying treatments (DMT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study on 438 PwMS and 481 age- and sex-matched subjects not affected by dysimmune diseases that underwent two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNtech). RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty five (51.4%) pwMS complained of ≥1 AP-AE after the first dose, 269 (61.4%) after the second dose. A logistic regression analysis revealed that only pwMS on Fingolimod and Ocrelizumab did not show a higher risk of developing AP-AE. The likelihood to present with ≥1 AP-AE, after correcting for age and sex, was significantly higher in pwMS than controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports qualitative and quantitative features of AP-AE associated with the first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large sample of pwMS. The only risk factor identified for developing AP-AE is female gender. AntiCD-20 monoclonal antibodies and S1P inhibitors are associated with a lower risk of AP-AE occurrence.

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in MS patients on disease modifying therapies during the Delta and the Omicron waves in Italy.

BACKGROUND: In this study we aimed to monitor the risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with MS (pwMS) under different DMTs and to identify correlates of reduced protection. METHODS: This is a prospective Italian multicenter cohort study, long-term clinical follow-up of the CovaXiMS (Covid-19 vaccine in Multiple Sclerosis) study. 1855 pwMS scheduled for SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were enrolled and followed up to a mean time of 10 months. The cumulative incidence of breakthrough Covid-19 cases in pwMS was calculated before and after December 2021, to separate the Delta from the Omicron waves and to account for the advent of the third vaccine dose. FINDINGS: 1705 pwMS received 2 m-RNA vaccine doses, 21/28 days apart. Of them, 1508 (88.5%) had blood assessment 4 weeks after the second vaccine dose and 1154/1266 (92%) received the third dose after a mean interval of 210 days (range 90-342 days) after the second dose. During follow-up, 131 breakthrough Covid-19 infections (33 during the Delta and 98 during the Omicron wave) were observed. The probability to be infected during the Delta wave was associated with SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels measured after 4 weeks from the second vaccine dose (HR=0.57, p < 0.001); the protective role of antibodies was preserved over the whole follow up (HR=0.57, 95%CI=0.43-0.75, p < 0.001), with a significant reduction (HR=1.40, 95%CI=1.01-1.94, p=0.04) for the Omicron cases. The third dose significantly reduced the risk of infection (HR=0.44, 95%CI=0.21-0.90,p=0.025) during the Omicron wave. INTERPRETATION: The risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections is mainly associated with reduced levels of the virus-specific humoral immune response. FUNDING: Supported by FISM - Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla - cod. 2021/Special-Multi/001 and financed or co-financed with the '5 per mille' public funding.

Humoral immune response in multiple sclerosis patients following PfizerBNT162b2 COVID19 vaccination: Up to 6 months cross-sectional study.

Appropriate immune response following COVID-19 vaccination is important in the context of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). In a prospective cross-sectional study, we determined SARS-COV-2 IgG response up to 6 months following PfizerBNT162b2 vaccination in 414 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 89 healthy subjects. Protective response was demonstrated in untreated MS patients (N = 76, 100%), treated with Cladribine (N = 48, 100%), Dimethyl fumarate (N = 35, 100%), Natalizumab (N = 32, 100%), and Teriflunomide (N = 39, 100%), similarly to healthy subjects (N = 89, 97.8%). Response was decreased in Fingolimod (N = 42, 9.5%), Ocrelizumab (N = 114, 22.8%) and Alemtuzumab (N = 22, 86.4%) treated patients. IgG response can help tailor adequate vaccine guidelines for MS patients under various DMTs.

Disease-modifying therapies and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in multiple sclerosis: an expert consensus.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) appeared in December 2019 in the Chinese city of Wuhan and has quickly become a global pandemic. The disease is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type-2 (SARS-CoV-2), an RNA beta coronavirus phylogenetically similar to SARS coronavirus. To date, more than 132 million cases of COVID19 have been recorded in the world, of which over 2.8 million were fatal ( https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html ). A huge vaccination campaign has started around the world since the end of 2020. The availability of vaccines has raised some concerns among neurologists regarding the safety and efficacy of vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) taking immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies.